Our complete practice licensing guide

Multi-state licensing and the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact.

A practice seeing patients across state lines — in person or by telehealth — runs into a fact that surprises a lot of first-time multi-state practices: there is no such thing as one license that works everywhere. The Interstate Medical Licensure Compact exists to make getting several licenses faster, not to make one license do the work of several. Understanding exactly what it speeds up, and what it leaves untouched, is what keeps a multi-state expansion plan realistic.

Key takeaways

  • The patient's location controls, not the provider's. A telehealth visit generally requires a license in whatever state the patient is physically sitting in.
  • The IMLC speeds up getting licenses, it doesn't replace needing them. An eligible physician still ends up with a separate license in each compact state.
  • Membership changes over time and isn't universal. Confirm current membership at imlcc.com rather than relying on a number that may already be outdated.
  • Not every provider type is eligible. The compact has historically applied to physicians, not automatically to every other licensed provider type.

Why multi-state practice needs multiple licenses in the first place

The general rule is that a physician needs a full, separate medical license in every state where the patient is physically located at the time of the encounter — not where the provider happens to be sitting. This applies just as much to telehealth as to in-person care: a physician licensed only in State A who sees a telehealth patient physically located in State B is generally practicing medicine in State B without a license there, regardless of how the visit was delivered. This single fact is what makes multi-state and telehealth-heavy practices treat licensing as an ongoing operational function rather than a one-time setup step.

How the IMLC's expedited pathway actually works

The Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, at imlcc.com, exists specifically to speed up this process for eligible physicians. Instead of submitting a full, independent application — including a fresh round of primary-source verification — to every state, an eligible physician's state of principal license issues a Letter of Qualification. Participating states in the compact use that letter to expedite issuing their own license to the physician, avoiding much of the redundant verification work a cold application in each state would otherwise require.

What the IMLC does
  • Speeds up the process of obtaining a license in each participating state.
  • Avoids redundant primary-source verification across compact states once a Letter of Qualification is issued.
  • Gives an eligible physician one streamlined pathway into multiple states instead of applying cold in each.
What the IMLC does not do
  • Does not waive the requirement to hold a license in each state where the physician practices.
  • Does not create one universal license valid everywhere.
  • Does not cover every provider type or every state automatically.

The physician still ends up holding a genuinely separate license, issued by each individual compact state's board, subject to that state's own renewal cycle and CME requirements described in our state medical board licensing guide. What changes is how fast those separate licenses can be obtained, not whether they're required.

Current membership: confirm it, don't quote a fixed number

As of 2026, IMLC membership is commonly cited in the 40-plus states range, but the exact figure moves as states join, and different sources report slightly different counts depending on when they were last updated. Rather than treating any specific number as a fixed fact, the reliable approach is to confirm current membership directly at imlcc.com before telling a physician or practice which states are covered — this is one of the few pieces of information in practice licensing that's genuinely a moving target, and quoting a stale number to a client can set the wrong expectation for a state that either joined or hasn't joined since the number was last checked.

Eligibility is also not universal even within member states. The compact has historically applied to physicians specifically, not automatically to every other licensed provider type, and not every physician meets the compact's eligibility criteria for a Letter of Qualification (which generally depends on their state of principal license and the standing of that license). Confirm both state membership and individual eligibility before building a timeline around the compact.

Multi-state licensing outside the compact

For a state that isn't a compact member, or a provider type the compact doesn't cover, there's no shortcut — the standard full state licensing process applies, with its own primary-source verification of medical school, residency, prior licenses, and disciplinary history, run independently in that state. This is the same process covered in full in our state medical board licensing guide, and the same caution applies: the timeline is usually gated by how quickly outside institutions respond to verification requests, not by anything the applicant controls directly.

This is worth planning for explicitly rather than assuming the compact will eventually cover every state a practice wants to expand into. A practice building a multi-state telehealth footprint should map its target states against current IMLC membership early, and budget realistic timelines for the states that fall outside it — treating those as full applications from day one rather than discovering partway through an expansion that a state was never a compact member to begin with.

Licensing obligations beyond the license itself

Holding an active license in a state — whether obtained through the compact or the standard process — is the floor, not the whole picture. Each state where a physician is licensed and practicing generally expects that physician to also meet that state's own telehealth-specific practice rules where they exist, its CME and renewal cycle described in our state medical board licensing guide, and often its own controlled substance registration if the physician prescribes controlled substances to patients in that state, on top of the DEA registration covered in our DEA registration guide. A multi-state practice is effectively running several parallel sets of these obligations at once, one per state, and none of them collapse into a single combined requirement just because the underlying license was obtained through an expedited pathway.

Pro tip

Before committing to a telehealth expansion into a new state, check three things separately: whether that state is currently an IMLC member, whether the specific physician is eligible for the compact pathway, and whether the state's own telehealth practice rules impose any additional requirements beyond licensure itself.

Step by step: expanding into a new state

  1. Confirm the target state's current IMLC membership at imlcc.comDon't rely on a previously checked number — membership changes.
  2. Confirm the physician's individual eligibility for the compact pathwayDepends on the standing of their state of principal license; not every physician qualifies.
  3. If eligible and the state is a member, obtain the Letter of QualificationIssued by the physician's state of principal license.
  4. Submit the expedited application to the target stateFaster than a cold application, but still results in a separate, distinct license.
  5. If ineligible or the state isn't a member, run the full state applicationSame primary-source verification process as any first-time state license application.
  6. Diarise the new license's renewal date and CME cycleEach state license runs on its own schedule from this point forward.

Expanding a practice across state lines?

We track IMLC eligibility, sequence expedited and standard state applications, and manage renewal dates across every state a provider is licensed in.

Talk to a specialist

Frequently asked questions

Does the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact create one license valid in every member state?

No. The IMLC doesn't waive state licensure or create a single universal license. It creates an expedited pathway: an eligible physician's state of principal license issues a Letter of Qualification, which participating states use to speed up issuing their own, separate license to that physician. The physician still ends up holding a distinct license in each compact state where they intend to practice — just obtained faster than applying cold in each one.

How many states are in the compact right now?

As of 2026, membership is commonly cited in the 40-plus range, but the exact count changes as states join, and reported figures vary depending on the source and when it was last updated. Rather than relying on any single number here, confirm current membership directly at imlcc.com before telling a physician or a practice which specific states are covered.

What about telehealth patients in a non-compact state, or a non-physician provider?

For a state outside the compact, or for a provider type the compact doesn't cover (it has historically applied to physicians, not every licensed provider type), the standard full state licensing process applies with no expedited pathway — the provider needs a complete, separate license in that state through its own state medical board, following the same primary-source verification process described in our state medical board licensing guide.

Confirm before you rely on this. Licensing fees, compact membership, training requirements and application processes change, and change by state. The process information on this page reflects standard industry practice as of August 2026 and is provided for general education — verify current requirements directly with the relevant state board, the DEA, or CMS before relying on it.

Related resources